In this fast-paced digital age, businesses of all sizes rely heavily on robust communication systems to maintain efficiency, streamline operations, and foster collaboration. Such systems are essential for fostering cooperation. Technology has not only brought about a revolution in how teams interact with one another, but it has also brought about challenges, such as the need to comply with regulations and ensure data security.

The recent revelations of China’s hack of western telecommunications providers across multiple countries are a red flag for corporate and government leaders who care about their sensitive data. The exfiltration of massive amounts of Internet data from western mobile and fixed line networks tells us that end-to-end encryption of internal data is table stakes, and that data protection requires a zero-trust, zero-knowledge, and post-quantum-friendly approach.

As our societies become integrated with technology, data security has been deemed to be of high importance. That is why, along with technological advances, new techniques to hack into networks and gain unauthorized access to personal data are being invented. Notably, the fastest upcoming threat that may continue chipping away at our cryptographic systems is quantum computing. That is where post-quantum cryptography, better known as PQC, comes in as a solution.

The Scottish Government’s decision to ban WhatsApp and other consumer-grade messaging apps for official business marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of secure and accountable workplace communication. This move, announced by Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes, reflects the urgent need for transparency, data sovereignty, and secure communication channels in modern governance. At Wire, we couldn’t agree more with this direction.

WhatsApp, the ubiquitous communication tool used for everything from family check-ins, party planning, unsanctioned work communications , and even the occasional cat meme. The app makes staying in touch incredibly easy. So easy in fact that WhatsApp is often used, whether purposefully or not, as a tool for corporate messaging and calling. For any business that has sensitive data to protect or keep private, there are many reasons why using WhatsApp for enterprise communication is a terrible idea.

‍ With over 10 million daily active users, Slack's popularity also makes it a prime target for cybercriminals. This increases the risk of data breaches, raising a vital question for enterprises seeking safe collaboration: Is Slack secure? As per Mimecast, 1 in 166 messages sent on Slack contains confidential information, creating opportunities for unauthorized access, phishing, or data leaks. In July 2024, a noteworthy incident also took place, which questioned its integrity.

Imagine this: you’re responsible for keeping your organization’s systems and software up to date, secure, and running smoothly. It’s no small task. The process of keeping track of security updates, managing patches for hardware and software, and ensuring patch compliance can feel like an endless cycle of frustration.

By now you’d assume most government organisations are aware of the risks associated with consumer messaging apps like WhatsApp, Signal and Telegram being used in the workplace. Consumer apps, convenient for personal use, are completely unsuited for official communications. They lack the necessary security, auditability and management controls that public sector organisations require.

Did you know cybercrime could cost the world $10.5 trillion by 2025? As more businesses adopt cloud solutions and rely on public cloud and private cloud computing environments, safeguarding cloud data is critical. Consequently, understanding infrastructure security in cloud computing and the role of Independent Software Providers is vital for protecting your assets.

‍ To achieve secure workplace collaboration, teams need to rely on more than just teamwork. They must access to real-time data and insights, empowering them to make data-driven decisions and solve problems together. Despite adopting varying degrees of digitization and tools, traditional workplaces often grapple with inefficiencies like misaligned objectives, poor communication, and redundant workflows.