Asynchronous work — when team members collaborate on the same project or assignment, but not at the same time — is a growing trend in the world of digital and Agile product development. Many teams have discovered that when time is of the essence, scheduling yet another meeting to “sync” might not be the best call. With full calendars, different time zones, and tight deadlines, asynchronous work can be a more efficient and flexible alternative.

Both managers and employees sometimes view one-on-one meetings with trepidation. Managers worry about the correct format and handling tough discussions, while employees might dread criticism or question the meetings' usefulness. But when effectively organized and focused on open communication, the one-on-one meeting is a key driver of team productivity, morale, and engagement, benefiting all involved.

Workplaces are hive centers of variety in today’s fast-paced global economy, not only in terms of skill sets and backgrounds but also in terms of age composition. The relationships between various age groups in the working have long been of interest, and new research has highlighted the negative effects that generational conflicts may have on worker productivity. In the US and the UK, generational conflicts have been connected to decreased workplace productivity, according to a PR Newswire study.

Hard work is always a key ingredient to success, regardless of industry. However, it is easy to fall in love with the grind, forgetting that there may be new ways to make the job easier. Given the importance of workforce efficiency in today’s competitive landscape, it is wise to leverage available technology for the workplace. One popular way successful businesses and teams do this is by using automation technology.

Forget the fluff and fanfare that usually kick off pieces like this. We’re here to talk brass tacks about the jungle that is product management software. It’s a wild, wild world out there—full of shiny tools and promises bigger than your average project backlog. But let’s cut through that buzz and get down to what really matters: making your workflow not just survive but thrive. Think of your current project management process as that one drawer in your house.

IBM has issued a challenge to its management personnel, signaling a dramatic change in the dynamics of the workplace: either come back to the office or leave the organization. This audacious move highlights how the nature of employment has changed since the pandemic and points to a potentially rocky future for corporate America.

Elevate your business process outsource strategy with the latest trends in BPO and outsourcing for 2024. Discover how employee and computer monitoring software, along with remote working solutions, can optimize your operations.

Between managing concerns about global markets and conflict to navigating new ways of working, climate change, and more, we’re living in a world where instability is one of our only constants. Our global innovation survey showed that this uncertainty has made enterprise leaders question how practical it is to actively focus on innovation. But we know the worst thing a company could do right now is to stop innovation entirely.

Tired of juggling multiple tools to manage your workday efficiently? Wish there was a single solution that could seamlessly integrate all of your tasks, projects, and time tracking in one place (not to mention your Google Calendar events)? Well, get ready to meet your new best friend: My Calendar, the latest addition to the Teamwork.com suite. Check out the video below for a step-by-step walkthrough of how it all works!

The argument around return-to-office (RTO) laws has been more heated in recent years. Many business executives are of the opinion that such policies are necessary for increasing productivity and raising the value of the organization. This premise, however, is called into question by the findings of a recent study that was conducted by the Katz Graduate School of Business at the University of Pittsburgh. The findings imply that RTO rules may not be providing the advantages that were anticipated for firms.